Pop Culture And Those Who Think They're Above It
Lady Gaga.
Twilight.
Glee.
These should sound familiar to everyone due to current pop culture trends. No doubt, there are going to be people who don't like one of these things, or many other things that are popular right now. Being opposed to something that seems to only be growing in popularity is quite alright, but frankly, you need to stick to your opinion--and you cannot just dislike something for the sake of being different. There is nothing more irritating than when an individual speaks freely about their issues with something popular in entertainment, when they don't have a feasible and legitimate argument.
Of the people and products I have listed, I am not saying that I necessarily am a fan of them, either. I will not waste my time putting them down and say how ridiculous it is when in reality, they get the last laugh, counting their cash while I drag my sorry ass to class and work every week. Let me take these one at a time and explain, in some detail, why they seem to be popular at the moment.
Lady Gaga can be called many things: eccentric, absurd, creative, ambitious, talented, silly, overrated, whatever you desire--but without proper knowledge and research on who Lady Gaga really is, you certainly are not going to understand her appeal or meaning behind the things that she does. In an interview with Ellen DeGeneres, Ellen asked point blank what the deal was with the fashion, the extravagant sets and the music. This is what Gaga had to say:
"The whole point of what I do--the monster ball, the music, the performance art and aspect of it--I want to create a space for my fans where they can feel free and they can celebrate because I didn't fit in in high school, and I felt like a freak. So I like to create this atmosphere for my fans where they feel like they have a freak in me to hang out with, and they don't feel alone."
She goes on to say:
"This is really who I am and it took a long time to be okay with that... [I'm sure] in high school, you feel discriminated against and you don't fit in, you want to be like everyone else, but not really. On the inside, you really want to be like Boy George...well I did, anyway (laughter)."
Lady Gaga, also, is a classically trained musician, using her skills and knowledge in a way that promotes an image of individualism, as well as creating a unity for those who feel like they have no voice. Moreover, she ACTUALLY sings when she performs live. It is incredibly hard to not acknowledge the amount of talent that seeps from her every core.
Twilight is a whole different story. Probably the most mocked of popular teen books in the past five years, the Twilight saga is an interesting animal to deal with. The books have gained more credibility than the films have, but both are constantly scrutinized by people who seem to be above these guilty pleasures--which is exactly what they are: shameless, summer guilty pleasures. Now, with this series, I can understand why people do not like the movies or the books, but in my opinion, you certainly have to participate in one or the other to decide whether your a fan or not.
Roger Ebert said in his review of the film "Eclipse", the third installment in the Twilight series that, "the “Twilight” movies are chaste eroticism to fuel adolescent dreams, and are really about Bella being attracted and titillated and aroused and tempted up to the … very … brink! … of surrender, and then, well, no, no, she shouldn’t."
This, coming from the man who said the Tomb Raider sequel, "uses imagination and exciting locations to give the movie the same kind of pulp adventure feeling we get from the Indiana Jones movies." I find it interesting that critics are able to lower their expectations on only certain summer blockbusters, yet refuse to do so for others. This leads me to believe that people are just going to not like the Twilight series for the sake of not liking them.
Entertainment Weekly said of the Twilight saga: "The Twilight movies, like the books on which they're based, are often mocked. But that's only because we're still, on some level, getting used to the novelty of a highly contemporary blockbuster saga that's this rooted in old-fashioned, borderline masochistic girlish romantic rapture. The movie version of Eclipse, with its dueling boy-monster hunks — a chaste orgy of male gazing — revels in the power that Bella experiences by giving herself over to the powerlessness of love. The movie is about a girl's primal dream of being desired. That may well be corny, but it's also an essential antidote to summer-movie hardware."
Nobody is saying these are going to win Academy Awards, nor were they made for that purpose. The art of entertainment is simply to entertain, and if people are entertained by this series, then by all means, let them be.
Let's move on to Glee. Glee exploded into a highly popular television series in the spring of 2009, when the original pilot aired. The show only grew in popularity the following fall, when the series continued into its first season. The show is corny, silly and shiny with just as corny remakes of classic pop songs. It is not deep in drama, there are no murder mysteries, the dialogue is not of the caliber of other comedy shows... but like Lady Gaga, it is a refuge to kids who feel like they don't fit in. Kristin Chenoweth, a guest star on the show, said on an interview on The View that Glee made being in Glee club "cool again" and that it speaks to kids who don't feel like they have a say. Not only that, but it is undeniable that the actors on this show are incredibly talented, each doing their own singing and dancing. Nobody expected the show to be as big of a success as it is. And even though the show is light and happy, they tend to cover some more serious issues in a lighter way (teen pregnancy, being a gay teenager, eating disorders...). To someone who doesn't commonly watch this show, it makes more sense for a show like Glee to cover these issues the way they do, instead of from shows that rely on ridiculous dramatic dialogue given to adults who think they understand the way a 15-year-old sees the world.
These are only a few examples I have up my sleeve, but my point is this: refusing to conform is, in essence, conforming. It is so frustrating when people seem to believe they understand what is better entertainment than everyone else by simply putting down those things that make other people happy. If you do not like a singer, book series, television show, movie or whatever, then be specific. The credibility of your argument rests entirely on a firsthand account of the things you despise so audibly.
If you're one of those people who still can't believe Arrested Development got cancelled, listens to The Beatles and nothing else, praises Wes Anderson movies as if he's still an independent filmmaker... move on. Time's have changed. Either get stuck in the past, or make your argument sensible.
Later Days,
-Michael Woodson-
Twilight.
Glee.
These should sound familiar to everyone due to current pop culture trends. No doubt, there are going to be people who don't like one of these things, or many other things that are popular right now. Being opposed to something that seems to only be growing in popularity is quite alright, but frankly, you need to stick to your opinion--and you cannot just dislike something for the sake of being different. There is nothing more irritating than when an individual speaks freely about their issues with something popular in entertainment, when they don't have a feasible and legitimate argument.
Of the people and products I have listed, I am not saying that I necessarily am a fan of them, either. I will not waste my time putting them down and say how ridiculous it is when in reality, they get the last laugh, counting their cash while I drag my sorry ass to class and work every week. Let me take these one at a time and explain, in some detail, why they seem to be popular at the moment.
Lady Gaga can be called many things: eccentric, absurd, creative, ambitious, talented, silly, overrated, whatever you desire--but without proper knowledge and research on who Lady Gaga really is, you certainly are not going to understand her appeal or meaning behind the things that she does. In an interview with Ellen DeGeneres, Ellen asked point blank what the deal was with the fashion, the extravagant sets and the music. This is what Gaga had to say:
"The whole point of what I do--the monster ball, the music, the performance art and aspect of it--I want to create a space for my fans where they can feel free and they can celebrate because I didn't fit in in high school, and I felt like a freak. So I like to create this atmosphere for my fans where they feel like they have a freak in me to hang out with, and they don't feel alone."
She goes on to say:
"This is really who I am and it took a long time to be okay with that... [I'm sure] in high school, you feel discriminated against and you don't fit in, you want to be like everyone else, but not really. On the inside, you really want to be like Boy George...well I did, anyway (laughter)."
Lady Gaga, also, is a classically trained musician, using her skills and knowledge in a way that promotes an image of individualism, as well as creating a unity for those who feel like they have no voice. Moreover, she ACTUALLY sings when she performs live. It is incredibly hard to not acknowledge the amount of talent that seeps from her every core.
Twilight is a whole different story. Probably the most mocked of popular teen books in the past five years, the Twilight saga is an interesting animal to deal with. The books have gained more credibility than the films have, but both are constantly scrutinized by people who seem to be above these guilty pleasures--which is exactly what they are: shameless, summer guilty pleasures. Now, with this series, I can understand why people do not like the movies or the books, but in my opinion, you certainly have to participate in one or the other to decide whether your a fan or not.
Roger Ebert said in his review of the film "Eclipse", the third installment in the Twilight series that, "the “Twilight” movies are chaste eroticism to fuel adolescent dreams, and are really about Bella being attracted and titillated and aroused and tempted up to the … very … brink! … of surrender, and then, well, no, no, she shouldn’t."
This, coming from the man who said the Tomb Raider sequel, "uses imagination and exciting locations to give the movie the same kind of pulp adventure feeling we get from the Indiana Jones movies." I find it interesting that critics are able to lower their expectations on only certain summer blockbusters, yet refuse to do so for others. This leads me to believe that people are just going to not like the Twilight series for the sake of not liking them.
Entertainment Weekly said of the Twilight saga: "The Twilight movies, like the books on which they're based, are often mocked. But that's only because we're still, on some level, getting used to the novelty of a highly contemporary blockbuster saga that's this rooted in old-fashioned, borderline masochistic girlish romantic rapture. The movie version of Eclipse, with its dueling boy-monster hunks — a chaste orgy of male gazing — revels in the power that Bella experiences by giving herself over to the powerlessness of love. The movie is about a girl's primal dream of being desired. That may well be corny, but it's also an essential antidote to summer-movie hardware."
Nobody is saying these are going to win Academy Awards, nor were they made for that purpose. The art of entertainment is simply to entertain, and if people are entertained by this series, then by all means, let them be.
Let's move on to Glee. Glee exploded into a highly popular television series in the spring of 2009, when the original pilot aired. The show only grew in popularity the following fall, when the series continued into its first season. The show is corny, silly and shiny with just as corny remakes of classic pop songs. It is not deep in drama, there are no murder mysteries, the dialogue is not of the caliber of other comedy shows... but like Lady Gaga, it is a refuge to kids who feel like they don't fit in. Kristin Chenoweth, a guest star on the show, said on an interview on The View that Glee made being in Glee club "cool again" and that it speaks to kids who don't feel like they have a say. Not only that, but it is undeniable that the actors on this show are incredibly talented, each doing their own singing and dancing. Nobody expected the show to be as big of a success as it is. And even though the show is light and happy, they tend to cover some more serious issues in a lighter way (teen pregnancy, being a gay teenager, eating disorders...). To someone who doesn't commonly watch this show, it makes more sense for a show like Glee to cover these issues the way they do, instead of from shows that rely on ridiculous dramatic dialogue given to adults who think they understand the way a 15-year-old sees the world.
These are only a few examples I have up my sleeve, but my point is this: refusing to conform is, in essence, conforming. It is so frustrating when people seem to believe they understand what is better entertainment than everyone else by simply putting down those things that make other people happy. If you do not like a singer, book series, television show, movie or whatever, then be specific. The credibility of your argument rests entirely on a firsthand account of the things you despise so audibly.
If you're one of those people who still can't believe Arrested Development got cancelled, listens to The Beatles and nothing else, praises Wes Anderson movies as if he's still an independent filmmaker... move on. Time's have changed. Either get stuck in the past, or make your argument sensible.
Later Days,
-Michael Woodson-
irritated
indescribable
calm
happy
numb
hopeful